16 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Stein
Stein
16 years ago

I don’t know. For some reason, I tend to lean toward the official story of them not having a license or opening their facility to USDA inspections. Only the cops and the family know the truth though.

Regarding market timing, nobody knows what is going to happen. Sure, things look bad but the spikes up and down aren’t predictable otherwise people would be rich beyond belief. This discussion reminds me of that infomercial software with green up arrows and red down arrows. Simply log in, watch the arrows which accuratly predict movements and become wealthy.

Many, many statistics show the more movements in and out of the market one makes, the lower their return in the long run.

There will be a recovery at some point, and it is almost guaranteed to happen before people think it will. It will also happen quicker than timers can react to. Upward movements are condensed into hours or days and if you miss just a few, your gains will be drastically lower.

Of course, the amount of time between now and retirement and the amount you have saved should affect where your money is, but a good plan works if times get tough, or even if they don’t.

Stein
Stein
16 years ago

Sure we were looking at an oncoming train, but it has been coming at us for over a decade. If one got out when it was first obvious, they would have missed the last half of the bull market. Smart guys like Prechter saw it coming in the late 80’s to early 90’s but their timing was wildly off. Nobody knew how long the bubble could be managed.

Also, in order to make a good trade, one needs to sell at the right time, then buy again at the right time. If you miss the upswing, you are no better off than the buy and hold strategy.

I pulled out at Dow 13k and got back in at Dow 10k. Was I smart? Nope, just lucky. If it is straight forward to get in and out at the right time, why aren’t there more rich people?

There are other factors as well. My company matches my 4% contribution. So, I am still in the black and when it goes up my gains will be double. Besides, what are my options, buy muni bonds? Buy a shovel? Buy government bonds with zero or negative return? Put all my eggs in the PM basket? None of those look too positive when I extend the horizon for 30 years.

A big part of the problem is that the only investment strategy that has potential over 30 years is stocks. Nothing else even comes close to the track record. FED and Congress ensure that PMs won’t be an answer, neither will simply saving money in a savings account or CDs. This is the true crime in America, people can’t just save money at a return of inflation plus a few percent without being in the equities market like they could a generation ago.

Do you honestly believe you can predict correct timing on both the crash and recovery? If you can, I am impressed, but I remember that you also predicted that gas would never fall below $2 again. I’m not beating on you, just pointing out that the future if full of surprises we cannot anticipate. Central banks are in uncharted territory. We have no historical data to see what the effect of dumping 8 trillion into the economy will do. That is where we are so far, not counting what Obama will add.

Mark
Mark
16 years ago

On the Manna thing , the feds don’t have to act like a buch of pissheaded facist , A simple subpoena in english should suffice.

Can we get to the mechanics of survival preparation , I find it far more useful?

Stein
Stein
16 years ago

I did get out, then back in because I realized I was simply guessing. I accepted that buying and holding quality businesses is a time-proven guaranteed way to make money. It has worked 100% of the time, without fail since the dawn of the country. I rode out the dot-com as well as 911 and made money on both of the rapid recoveries (not to mention the stocks I bought at or near the bottom from my monthly investing).

There simply is no period of time where buying and holding quality companies (American and international) hasn’t returned a premium as long as your timeframe is at least 10 years. Roughly half comes from appreciation and half from dividends (GE is paying me 7% and MSFT is paying me 2.5% as we speak).

If a mutual fund or hedge fund manager with a $1M research budget and a staff of 50 economists and analysts can’t time the market, I am under no illusion that little old Stein can beat the system.

I fully agree the writing was on the wall for this correction, but the big question is when to get back in? With the DOW oscillating up to 900 points a day, how will you be ahead of the market recovery? Simply getting out is only 1/3 of the equation. In order to win, you must exit correctly, move to the correct investment to ride out the storm, then buy back at the right time. You need three decisions to all be correct in order to succeed.

What investment will do better in the next 12 months: CD, savings account, silver/gold, energy, food commodities, bond fund or S&P 500 fund?

What is your indicator to re-enter the stock market?

Thanks for the discussion, I enjoy the friendly debate. If you are interested in a friendly wager on predicting the bottom or where to invest your money in the next 12 months, let me know!

Stein
Stein
16 years ago

Thanks for the debate. Yes, it is historically true. I know you are trying to trip me up by cherry picking an index, but I am one step ahead of that!

Pull up the Russell 2000 broad market index (four times the companies as the S&P 500) and you will see it is true. Factor in dividends and there isn’t a 10 year period with a negative return (not to mention my horizon of 30 years). Dec 11, 1998 close was 395.37, today it is sitting at 456.72. Not good, but still a positive 15%. Factor in my employer match and tax deferal and the return is actually quite good – even in the worst decade we have seen for at least 50 years.

I have no idea whether this downtrend will break that record and be the first in history, it very well might. I do know which direction the next 100% move will be though.

I don’t listen to advisors as you assume (actually, I have never sought the advice of a single investment advisor), I separate the fact from fiction and make what I feel is an informed decision.

Periodically investing in the broad market through low cost index funds one’s working life has been an excellent and painfully simple strategy that has worked for over 100 years.

Seriously, if you have a better idea I would be very interested in hearing it. You challenge me which is fair and fun, but I have an open mind if you have a legitimate strategy that increases risk adjusted return for 10-30 year periods.

Even if you pull up another index with a negative decade return, I will pull up rolling returns on gold, silver, energy, food and real estate charts with losses 10x worse.

I hate to say it, but you are not right on this issue, buy and hold is a winning strategy. I just showed you how it works for 10 years, now look at the 30 or 40 year rolling returns. For 30 year periods, the worst period to date was 4% real returns (inflation adjusted). The most unlucky guy in the universe could have compounded his money at 7-8% over his working lifetime by using this strategy.

Brian Gallimore
16 years ago

Jack, can you provide some links and/or data to back up the $440k/person debt. Someone called me on it and I have no idea how you got to that number!

David
David
16 years ago

I am reposting a previous post of mine to another blog that mentions your figure. –and I am not trying to diminish the importance of your point that the national debt is ridiculously high, but you need to reconsider your figures. Look below:

http://www.treasurydirect.gov/NP/BPDLogin?application=np
12/11/2008
Current Debt Held by the Public — 6,390,881,581,542.01
Intragovernmental Holdings — 4,207,003,477,916.77
Total Public Debt Outstanding — 10,597,885,059,458.78

http://www.census.gov/
Population Clocks
U.S. 305,880,027
World 6,743,414,834
16:39 GMT (EST+5) Dec 14, 2008

per capita national debt is $34,647.20

Actually, you should reconsider your figures

http://www.treasurydirect.gov/NP/BPDLogin?application=np
12/11/2008
Current Debt Held by the Public — 6,390,881,581,542.01
Intragovernmental Holdings — 4,207,003,477,916.77
Total Public Debt Outstanding — 10,597,885,059,458.78

http://www.census.gov/
Population Clocks
U.S. 305,880,027
World 6,743,414,834
16:39 GMT (EST+5) Dec 14, 2008

per capita national debt is $34,647.20

But, don’t get me wrong. Even this number is bad.

David
David
16 years ago

Sorry for the duplication of text; a simple cut-and-paste operation gone bad.

One other point (although slightly off topic) I would like to make:

http://www.treasurydirect.gov also contains evidence that debunks the “myth of the clinton surplus” as outlined by Craig Steiner in the following article.

http://www.craigsteiner.us/articles/16

David
David
16 years ago

I looked at that link before I posted. But we are talking about two figures and mixing them up. Originally, you stated that the government has racked up $440,000 on my behalf. Individual, household, family, whatever — that figure is inaccurate if it is being represented as what the government has racked up for us. I don’t disagree to the fact that individuals have racked up their own debt on their own. I’m fine with an analysis that takes personal and government-created and adds them up to show what is owed on each person’s behalf. That’s fine. But don’t call it all government-created debt.

No, I’m not a fan of the government, I’m just seeking accuracy.

Bottom line — personal debt, gov’t debt, both — I agree that a lot of people are in really screwed.