@Steven Fletcher yet they allowed the headline to stand and buried the correction in the fine print. Wow what journalists! Good to hear my instincts were correct on this one though. Wonder if Alex Jones if over hyping it?

@Bigal7997 thanks for the info, that fungus is known as Ergot. It usually isn’t rapidly fatal though, it causes hallucination as well and it infects rye. It is believed to be the cause of the Salem Witch Trials. I guess it is possible but the article if believed says that the grass was tested and tested positive for cyanide. Also like I said ergot usually doesn’t kill and certainly not that fast but I guess it is possible.

Michael Fullerton, honestly I agree to a point. The “conservatives” you speak of are generally republicans not conservatives. More specifically yuppie type jackass republicans that think Mitt Romney is a conservative. Those types. Basically “city types” of any type of political stripe tend to act like complete assholes this way. This is why I refuse to live in anything like a suburb, etc. If I ever set up a community the basic rule of law will be if you don’t like what someone else does on their land, tough shit LOL.

@Brendan CO2 has a “saturation limit” one we long ago passed up. CO2 only reflects a very narrow band of UV light, not the whole spectrum as we are led to believe by the main stream media and Al Gore types. I need to point out here this is absolute scientific fact, known, proven and never disproven since the late 1800s. We could not triple or even quadruple the CO2 and it would have no effect on global temps.

This is the point no one has ever successfully addressed or responded to from the global warming crowd. The out has always been that somehow in some way CO2 behaves differently in the ionosphere then in the main atmosphere.

In 2011 NASA ran a study you can see the results here http://news.yahoo.com/nasa-data-blow-gaping-hold-global-warming-alarmism-192334971.html

The real goal never stated in the results (because the results didn’t support the global warming agenda) was to shut people like me up and prove us wrong. They simply measured heat in vs. heat out and figured it would support the climate models. If it did they would have proven that by some mysterious process CO2 would have the ability to break the saturation limit. Problem was, well the data showed the models were inaccurate (nice way of saying CO2 obeys the laws of physics and global warming from CO2 is hype).

Again the saturation limit is well known but ignored and often hidden scientific fact. I can’t remember the year it was proven but it was like the 1870s-1880s and it has never been proven false.

There have been many attempts to prove this wrong and a lot of propaganda that claims to. Yet here is the fact and how it was calculated in the first place. If you shine light though a contained glass environment you can measure how much heat from the light is absorbed by the gas inside the container. As you raise CO2 it holds back more heat acting as a greenhouse gas just as we are told. Yet once the saturation limit is approached the effect drops dramatically and then falls off to being meaningless.

Things that hold in heat better then CO2 include water vapor and methane. Again this is all 100% fact. It is the silver bullet and you can’t find diddly about it because this truth is buried. Given proving it false would be as cheap and easy as some glass containers, CO2, UV lights and thermometers and it has never been proven false, you have to ask why? I have been asked many times what would it take to make me admit that CO2 could be causing global warming, my answer is always simply, prove the CO2 limit false. No one has and no one can because it is a LAW, like gravity. It is simply how things work.

The whole thing is a lie!

Yes man made climate change exists. We drain wetlands, we put mercury in the water, we create deserts, we clear cut forests, we destroy soil, etc, etc, etc. These are all real concerns and real forms of pollution but have you notices none of the global warming alarmists are concerned about any of these things. The CO2 causes global warming lie has done more harm to the environmental movement then any other issue.

People like us need to admit this is a damn lie and focus on the actual damage and pollution to save this planet. Sadly thanks to the people that simply want a global carbon tax, many people will no longer even listen to anything related to protecting the environment. FRIEND, that is by design, it is part of the dichotomy! Keep the people divided and in debt while you tax the shit out of them and deprive them of liberty. Some things never change, that strategy is very old, AGW is just one of the latest tools to do it.

Considering that there are thousands of things harming the planet that 99% of us could agree on why do you think the flagship issues is such a divisive one? It is by design.

Now you know something you likely didn’t will you consider it or simply cling to your existing belief?