8 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Dave
Dave
8 years ago

Another great way to do duck is Bun mang vit, http://www.authenticworldfood.com/en/exotic-recipes/vietnam/duck-noodle-soup-bun-mang-vit.html for an example. Shredding the bamboo is a little of a pain but not that bad. One of my favorite things to cook. Ask one of the girls at your local nail shop where you can try it.

joshinga
joshinga
8 years ago

John Pugliano is the man of all men when it comes to financial matters. I’ve been in the business for nearly 20 years and had no clue what a 770 plan was. But I learned something from him, and Jack, today, as I seem to do a lot with John,

However, I needed to point out a couple things when it comes to life insurance and estate planning. Life insurance is 100% absolutely, unequivocally included in your estate at death. It does NOT escape estate tax. Inheritance tax only applies to individual states, such as NJ, MD and PA and a few others.

Of course EVERYTHING you own is included in your estate at death. EVERYTHING! To include Life Insurance. I can not stress this enough. If you have a large life insurance policy and you think it’s going to escape estate taxation, you are wrong!

Now what “rich” people do is they move ownership of the policy to an irrevocable trust. Not a living trust mind you an irrevocable trust, or they change ownership of the policy to someone else. THere are estate and gift tax consequences of doing this too and I’m telling you right now, if you think you can simply avoid an estate tax by transferring ownership without proper continual documentation, the IRS will have a nice surprise for your heirs.

Is your Trustee filing appropriate 1041’s? Are there Crummey Letters going out AND being documented annually? Did you file the IRS Form 709 when you gifted the assets to someone else? No? Then your heirs will be in a world of hurt.

I know this is a diatribe here, but I’m telling you, I deal with this crap daily and people, to include many attorneys, simply do not get what they are contending with when it comes to the IRS, never mind the local taxing authorites, NY state in particular.

Secondly, if you have a Permanent Life Insurance policy you damn well better request an INFORCE illustration every couple yrs to make sure that puppy will survive you. If you don’t, you’ll be 76 yrs old with a million dollar policy with only 15k to support it. That sucker will lapse in the next couple yrs leaving you with NOTHING, No death benefit, no cash value! That is no joke and worse if you borrowed against it, guess what? You’ll have a tax hit that will rock your world.

Lastly on a good note. NJ just repealed it’s STATE estate tax. http://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/the-repeal-of-the-new-jersey-estate-tax-59377/

So you can die there in 2018. However they still have an inheritance tax too, but hey, for now, this is a step in the right direction.

joshinga
joshinga
8 years ago
Reply to  joshinga

Agree 100%, the OWNER is what determines the estate. That is not debatable. And Jack, once again mi amigo, you hit it on the head in regard to OWNER being the kid AND beneficiary, with the dad being the insured. Could be some gift tax issues, if there is any sizeable cash value and you are giving the kid the money for premiums, but on term, nah.

Of course, the vast, VAST majority of term policies don’t survived the insured anyway. So, if you are trying to create an estate with life insurance term is not the way to go.

However, if anyone is reading this, be careful, very careful, of the unholy trinity where the owner, the beneficiary and the insured are three different people or entities. That is a very bad arrangement.

Don’t know how you get the time to understand all you do Jack, but you’re a wealth of knowledge man. Crazy.

joshinga
joshinga
8 years ago

Oh and another thing, on this little diatribe of mine about permanent life insurance. Life insurance is no different than a firearm. it’s an inanimate object thus it is neither good nor evil, even though many suggest permanent life insurance is inherently bad. It’s not.

However sales people propose it saying things such as “this life insurance policy is paying 4%…” and leave it to the buyer to insinuate they will get a 4% rate of return. NO! That’s not how it works.

The policy may CREDIT 4% but you certainly are not getting that as a rate of return. The crediting rate is BEFORE any fees, commissions etc. So, if you hear this, you simply say, “let me see an illustration.” the agent will show you one and I can almost guarantee your 10k initial deposit/premium will not be worth $10400 after year one. It’ll probably be worth less than what you put in.

In fact a strong life insurance company with a 4% crediting rate after 10 yrs you’ll probably have netted a 2% rate of return on your cash value, depending on your underwriting. That 2% has grown tax free so it’s not a bad deal, AND you had insurance as well, but it’s a far cry from the 4% insinuated.

Just another pet peeve of mine about the insurance industry.

And I do carry term, Whole Life and Universal life on myself, my spouse and my kids. I also own rifles, shotguns and handguns. All of those products are indifferent in how I use them. They just exist to serve a purpose, however the end user decides.

Michael Sparks
8 years ago

Wondering what’s the basis of the negativity on the financial tool of permanent insurance when used properly that can help the average person build more wealth and protect assets over multiple generations, while saving on taxes and having a guaranteed benefit? Is this from research, personal use or financial entertainers?

I know of no other tool like it and have yet to find one.