Comments

SweetDrops Liquid Stevia – Item of the Day — 15 Comments

  1. Be sure to shake before using. One reason folks might be put off by the taste is because of settling in the bottle.

  2. Coke in the 70’s, and 60’s, and previous decades, as well as the other brand names used Corn Syrup as a sweetener. THIS IS NOT HIGH FRUCTOSE CORN SYRUP (HFCS) !!! Corn Syrup was Glucose. Glucose is the sugar that the body runs on, its the sugar that basically all life on the planet runs on. People use fats and oils differently, and vegetables, but everything else gets turned into glucose to fuel the body.

    So drinking coke in the old day would of really been no different of a sugar load than eating a few slices of bread. You have to understand the SCIENCE behind this and NOT to just say ‘this is evil’ and ‘that is evil’. HFCS is fructose and its sucrose. These are 2 different sugars than glucose. These get broken down by the body differently. As the famous guy on youtube will tell you, you are taking in fructose from HFCS but you are NOT getting the fiber from the fruit to aid in its digestion and thus you get the negative effects of Fructose.

    That is the basics of it, I’m sure Darby Simpson could do a whole show on the subject. In short… well… we’d be a lot better not having sodas and pops, but it would be a hell of a step in the right direction if we went back to simple corn syrup as a sweetener. Why did they go to HFCS? Its cheaper and its sweeter. Just look at people in movies from the 60’s and 70’s and people in movies from the 80’s and 90’s…. see the difference. ?

    I added this comment because of Jacks excellent remark on Corn Sugar in the posting above. I personally have a very low sugar diet. I have a carb diet, but I take in a very low amount of items saturated with sugar. I’ve just gotten it out of what I eat.

    • Steve until the switch to HFCS Coke and most other manufactures in the US used CANE SUGAR, not corn syrup at all.

      The first company to make the change was Ocean Spray, the guy that is responsible for it made a 4 million dollar bonus doing it, everyone followed suit after that.

      I remember the interview with him in the 80s on 20/20, he took his money and bought a huge ranch in Montana, they named it “The Sugar Ranch”.

      For what it is worth all sugar spikes insulin, do it long enough and you become insulin resistant, and all the modern diseases from High Blood Pressure, Type II diabetes, etc. come right along with it.

      Steve you should spend the 6.50 for a copy of Protein Power by Doctors Jan and Michael Eades, it is honestly the most scientific explanation for why low carb eating is the best way to live. Here is a link http://amzn.to/2a9LmCq

      People get all in a wad too about it since say phase one is about 21-30 carb grams a day. But just miss the long term. This is done until you are stabilized in blood pressure, blood sugar, etc and with in 10% of hitting your goal for long term weight loss.

      It is then raised to 50 grams a day, until you hit your target weight. You can then increase it 10 grams a week, until your protein and carb grams are equal, IF YOU DON’T START gaining weight or having your readings come back up. If you do you back off ten and that is your long term level.

      If you are eating real food 60-70 grams is a LOT of food carb wise. By that point you can even have some potatoes, etc. The key with Protein Power and why I went back to it is you must calculate and consume your protein requirement based on lean body mass. When you do this, you can’t over eat carbs, you are shocked at what your required protein needs are and how much food it is.

      Sure the rule is you can have fat, not even count it, but if you first build meals to get your needed protein you won’t eat as much as you would think. I have actually go back to this method over Paleo and here is why.

      If you do Protein Power you will basically be Paleo anyway and you can’t do it wrong but you damn sure can do Paleo wrong.

      The truth is I put way too much of my weight back on after moving back to Texas. It isn’t the fault of paleo nutrition, but my fault for falling off the wagon. This recently this reality hit me hard. I went back to true carb restriction based on what the Eades teach, 16 pounds gone in 18 days. Eating more total food than I have in years.

      The science is very solid!

      FWIW you can get coke with cane sugar in many Mexican groceries, they use cane sugar in Mexico. But it is still way too much sugar, but yes it is far, far, far better that GMO Corn HFCS.

      • Back in 2011, Dr Pepper has their 125 anniversary throwback original formula with real sugar. It was simply amazing. Mountain Dew is currently having their throwback, but I haven’t tasted it, as I haven’t had soda since January.

  3. If you have a Trader Joe’s near you, check the liquid stevia there. Haven’t been there in a few months, since the stuff lasts a long time, but the 2 0z. bottle sold for 6 bucks and change.

  4. Coca-cola with sugar is available in limited quantities during Passover. It must be labelled “Kosher for Passover” or have the Hebrew inscription that says the same thing but if you don’t read Hebrew, just ask your local grocer. He probably doesn’t read Hebrew either, but if he ordered any, he placed it in the Jewish food section of the store.

  5. LOVE SweetLeaf. It’s the only stevia with zero carbs. I use the liquid but also the powdered. They also make flavored versions of the liquid and I will get carbonated water and use both the flavored and the regular (liquid) to make my own carbonated refreshments. Like the root beer the best. The berry is also quite yummy. The cola is okay but far from my favorite.

  6. I’ve been using PURE powdered stevia. I find that the liquid is more bitter. You just have to be careful because it’s at least 200 times sweeter than sugar. The stuff that measures the same as sugar has malto-dextrin in it which has a higher glycemic index than pure sugar.

  7. This is not meant to be a disparaging remark, if one can actually be disparaging about a product. I bought several of these months ago and kind of wish I had bought only one to try before going all out. To each his own; we all have different tastes, and I just read above that the product needs shaking before using, which I did not do. I bought it because the price was right and it is a family owned business, and we try to give them a boost whenever possible. That said, it really is I think sweet to the point of being not enjoyable. I started buying Mommy Knows Best pure stevia powder. It can be found on Amazon, typically the smaller containers. So I went to the makers to order mine and got their largest containers for very little more than what I paid on Amazon for the small container. I do this often. I find there is a cost benefit to going directly to the maker. Again, this is not an attempt to discourage any from buying the drops. It is simply my findings, but I will shake the bottle and give it a try. Mommy Knows Best is extremely good, using very little.

    • Funny cause the number one complaint I see in the negative reviews is it isn’t sweet enough.

  8. I’ve been using liquid Stevia for several years. Found this brand about 8-9 months back. To my taste buds it is the sweetest by far. I use about 1/2 as much as other liquid Stevia’s. It almost makes me suspicious because to me it tastes so much better…

    My wife likes the Pure Via. I carry it on trips so I don’t have to use the other junk and the powder keeps me from being hassled by our valiant protectors of the airways…

  9. Perfect recommendation, I’ll be happy to try this. I was looking today for a whey protein powder and don’t know if there is anything out there I would enjoy. Any suggestions?

    • It is pretty much inert in the human body.  It is the extract of a tropical herb and calorie free.  Unlike artificial sweeteners it isn’t some indigestible form or sugar or some lab crafted chemical.  It actually doesn’t have any sugar, hence calorie free.  It just tastes sweet to humans, extremely so.   It is actually 200 times sweeter then sugar ounce for ounce.

      The only possible downside is over eating because you think you can since you are cutting sugar.  In other words you can’t use it as an excuse to start scarfing down pasta and bread.

      In the end if you cut sugar with stevia and eat the same you are cutting calories and carbs.   So I say you are far better off.  If you cut sugar and replace those calories you are about the same, if you cut sugar but increase beyond what you cut you are worse off.  Make sense?